Following the media introduction, we took home a pre-production sled. The machine was predictable in how it reacted to bumps and holes, and the nose stayed pointed down the trail when jamming the throttle at the apex of a turn. The 2006 Arctic Cat Crossfire worked very well in moguls and rippled sections of the trail it was better than our 2005 Arctic Cat F7 Firecat. The bigger track made the Crossfire less nimble than its predecessor, but the added stability outweighed the tradeoff. Riders’ knees were positioned closer to a 90-degree bend than on a Firecat, which means easier stand-up transitions for bumps and off-trail riding.ĭue to its longer, wider track, the Arctic Cat Crossfire felt more stable in the rough than an Arctic Cat Firecat. The ergo setup provided drivers with a commanding view of the terrain. It’s built on the M-Series chassis with a 15- by 136- by 1.25-inch track, and boasts a rider-forward position with a tall seat and wide, hooked handlebars. A lot of 2006 fanfare was steered toward the new dual-purpose Arctic Cat Crossfire series.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |